AT&T Cable finally switched all the channels and
added a bunch of channels
to the Concord lineup. Although it did not come as a surprise to me --
they had
mailed a pamphlet saying "this is your new cable lineup starting 08/00"
-- the
timing was unexpected. I was expecting August 1st and when it didn't
change
then I forgot about it. So I come home and find out that I've taped all
the
wrong channels. Rather annoying.
Although I don't really care for the new channels (other than E! which
I really
wanted a year ago, but now I'm less enthused), it's interesting to see
what
gets moved around. Some of the regular cable channels are moved up to
the
digital cable range to entice people to buy that service, I suppose.
Local
channels are still accessible to basic cable subscribers. They moved
KCRA
(Channel 3 in Sacramento) and switched it with TBS. Only reason I can
think
for this move is to avoid channel surfers confusing KRON and KCRA. KRON
is still
next to the other regular channels, so surfers are more likely to watch
NBC
shows on KRON instead of KCRA. Inconvenient for me because I'd rather
watch
KCRA.
Which reminds me, aren't local channels supposed to be protected? I
remember
cable companies blacking out programming on other channels if it's the
same
as the local channel. I guess KRON and KCRA are not local to Concord.
Makes
me think that KRON got AT&T Cable to move KCRA somewhere less
convenient.
But I'm probably reading too much into it. Neither ClickTV nor TVGuide
have
the new cable lineup correct, so I guess the change caught them
offguard too...
|
So after using iCab for three weeks, I can say that it
isn't quite as great
as I had first thought it was. It's a bit slow now, though maybe that's
just
perceived slowness because it renders in a different order than
Netscape. HTTPS
support is not quite correct, some sites work and other sites give an
error.
The iCab people blame Apple's library. I already knew InScript support
was
not finished, but it's amazing how many sites use scripts, some of
which break
in iCab. In general I still like it and use it as my primary browser,
but I
have to keep Netscape handy for the occassional problematic sites...
I'm waiting for Apple to announce their new PowerBooks, which could be
during
Seybold but could be later. Mostly because then the price of current
PowerBooks
will go down and maybe I can buy a refurbished PowerBook 500 for $2600
or so.
The Performa 6400 is going to go away, I want a faster and more stable
server,
I want a faster computer to run Virtual PC. All these factors are
slowly pushing
me to getting another PowerBook, then I can use the old one as a
server.
It's more expensive than that because I'd have to get more RAM and at
least a
Serial to USB adapter so I can continue using my Ricochet modem. Maybe
an ADB
to USB adapter so I can keep using my keyboards and mice, although
buying new
keyboards and mice is probably only a little more expensive.
I'm assuming that the new PowerBooks won't be a huge amount faster, due
to the
bad CPU yields from Motorola. Apple should buy G3 processors from IBM.
They
don't want to buy G4s from IBM unless IBM makes them with Altivec,
which is a
Motorola addition. Motorola is not really willing to lease the plans
Altivec
design to IBM, probably because IBM has better chip facilities and will
outproduce and outquality Motorola. A G4 PowerBook would be really
cool, but
unlikely until the G4e which will be less power hungry. Apple has just
released
a software update that makes movie playback faster because now it uses
the
Altivec routines...
|