kcw | reviews | dvd << Previous Page | Next Page >>
Year:   2000
Studio: Warner Brothers/Morgan Creek/
        Franchise Pictures
Movie:  3/5
DVD:    3/5

Movie

The problem with Battlefield Earth is that it's too closely associated with Scientology. Many people (me included) consider Scientology more of a cult than the religion thwy profess to be. I place Scientology in the same category as any other self-help philosophy, except that they try to get even more money from their adherents.

Maybe that's not why Battlefield Earth failed, but it was definitely one of the big complaints about the movie. Considering that the movie has nothing to do with Scientology other than being funded by that group and having a Scientologist as one of the main actors, it's surprising how much criticism it got on that score.

So what is the movie about? It's the year 3000 and for the last millenia Earth has been a conquered world. Long enough for humans to have reverted to a primitive Native American-looking culture with its own myths about how the world used to be.

This is the story Johnny (Barry Pepper), a Greener and wanderer, who is captured by the ruling Psiclones or whatever they're called. Psiclones use humans to dig up gold, which is the most precious metal in the galaxy.
The head Psiclone at the complex, Terl (John Travolta), has a plan to make himself rich. But to do that he needs a human leader to server as his pawn, so he uses a teaching machine to make Johnny smart. But now that Johnny has all this knowledge he comes up with a plan to overthrow the Psiclones and reclaim Earth. Much action and explosions follow.

DVD

Commentary is provided by Director Roger Christian and Production Designer Patrick Tatopoulos. It's kind of funny listening to their tone as they seem to have a total disconnect of how bad the movie was received by the public. The only other noteworthy extra is a 15-minute behind-the-scenes featurette.

Recommendations

In the end it's a fairly standard low budget science fiction adventure movie. It had a lot of hype and promotion and did a dismal $21.5m box office take on a $73m movie. But as a rental movie it's not bad. In the end I guess you should watch it if you've read the book.
Copyright (c) 2004 Kevin C. Wong
Page Created: March 11, 2004
Page Last Updated: March 11, 2004