Type:
Theatrical Movie
Year:
2001
Production:
The Carausel Picture Company
Hey, I liked this movie. It's a simple plot based on the
book and done in a
dozen different movies (my favorite being "The Three Musketeers" with
Kiefer Sutherland, Charlie Sheen, Oliver Platt, and Chris O'Donnell).
There
is young D'Artagnan (Justin Chambers), an orphan raised by Planchet
(Jean-
Pierre Castaldi). Planchet is a gypsy swordsmaster who taught
D'Artagnan's
father. D'Artagnan learns to be a superb, if unconventional, swordsman,
all
the while burning for revenge at the man who killed his parents.
But for now he arrives in Paris looking to become one of
the famed
King's
Musketeers. Alas, times are not so good for the loyal Musketeers, for
they
have been framed with murdering Spain's envoy to France. Disbanded and
with
their leader in jail, D'Artagnan only finds Porthos (Steven Spiers) and
Aramus (Nick Moran) at the barracks. At least they point him to a cheap
place
to stay. An inn that used to teem with would be Musketeers, though now
it is
also in decline. But it is at the inn that D'Artagnan meets the fair
Constance (Mena Suvari).
D'Artagnan enlists the aid of Aramus and Porthos and the
three free
Rochefort
(David Schofield) from prison. With the leader of the Musketeers once
again
free, D'Artagnan is in like Flynn with the group, though still not an
official Musketeer himself. Meanwhile, Cardinal Richelieu (Stephen Rea)
is
not going to stand idly by and let the Musketeers ruin his plan to take
over
France. He arranges to have to King Louis XIII (Daniel Mesguich)
embarrased
at a dinner held in honor of the English ambassador, Lord Buckingham
(Jeremy
Clyde). The Musketeers once again step in and avert disaster, though
not
embarassment.
With French-English relations badly hurt by the fiasco,
The Queen
(Catherine
Deneuve) travels incognito to Madame Lacross' (Tsilla Chelton) estate
and
onwards to meet secretly with Lord Buckingham. Only Planchet,
D'Artagnan,
and Constance accompany the Queen (Constance's mother was one of the
Queen's
handmaidens when she came over to marry King Louis XIII). Alas, her
plans are
spoiled by Richelieu's henchman Febre (Tim Roth). Febre captures the
Queen
and forges a note to Lord Buckingham. Now when Buckingham goes to meet
the
Queen, Febre will kill them both and start a war.
|
Febre is out of control and even Richelieu can't control
him. He's holed up
in a castle with his army of Hessian mercenaries, ready to let loose
the dogs
of war. Once again, only D'Artagnan and the Musketeers stand between
the good
of France and anarchy. And now D'Artagnan's quest is personal, for
Febre is
the man that killed his parents. Once again into the breach, for
France, for
the King!...
As I said, there's nothing really new here with respect
to the plot.
What
they did this time though was hire Xiong Xin Xin to do the fight
choreography
in the "Hong Kong style". Lots of really cool acrobatic moves and
displays of
breathtaking swordsmanship. There are a few times when it's obviously
wires,
because like in "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon", Hong Kong style
doesn't
worry about breaking physics. Still there are not that many fight
scenes.
The first fight scene is in a bar. D'Artagnan walking on
rolling wine
barrels
and hanging off of the ceiling. Then there are some more conventional
fights,
nothing spectacular. There's a cool chase fight on Planchet's
wagon/home,
think stagecoach. It includes D'Artagnan standing up on his horse,
running
and jumping onto another moving horse, then leaping again back onto the
wagon. Plus the obligatory falling among the wagon horses and then
crawling
to the back of the wagon. Then there's D'Artagnan scaling a rope and
fighting
some Hessian mercenaries on their own ropes. And then we have the final
duel
between D'Artagnan and Febre. For some reason there's is a big
barn-like
building with lots of ladders. It doesn't make any sense but it does
make it
a pretty spectacular final battle.
Take out the great fights and the movie is below
average. The problem
with it
is there are a lot of badly edited plot holes. Little things like how
did he
know this or how did we get here? It goes from one scene to another and
you
missed a scene, though that only happens once or twice. Mostly it's a
lot of
"well, if this is true then why didn't they do this or why hasn't that
happened?" In the final analysis, I did enjoy the movie. There are
better
movies out there right now. This movie is sort of a "Knight's Tale" for
17th
Century France. It's not bad, but it could have been better with better
writing.
|